Skip to the comparison
STET
Run it on your repo

GPT 5.6 Luna low vs Haiku 5.5 low

GPT 5.6 Luna low leads on speed and cost; quality is too close to call.

Quality
+0.1 pts
Haiku 5.5 low
1–1 head to head, 22 tied
Speed
1.5× faster
GPT 5.6 Luna low
6.7 min vs 9.9 min per task
Cost
1.3× cheaper
GPT 5.6 Luna low
$0.05 vs $0.06 per task

24 tasksData from

Stet score

GPT 5.6 Luna lowcodex · low reasoningRank 15 of 17

45.095% range 39.1–50.4

Haiku 5.5 lowlow reasoningRank 14 of 17

45.195% range 40.2–49.30.1 points higher

A directional read: their 95% score ranges overlap.

Quality

Head-to-head matchups

GPT 5.6 Luna low won1

Tied22

Haiku 5.5 low won1

Haiku 5.5 low’s win share 51%, 95% range 46–57%Ties are within judge noise.

Task by task

GPT 5.6 Luna low solved 0 tasks that Haiku 5.5 low didn’t, and Haiku 5.5 low solved 1 that GPT 5.6 Luna low didn’t. Both solved 10; neither solved 13.

stet-commit-bbbbae09Solved by 15 of 17 setups

  • GPT 5.6 Luna lowFailed
  • Haiku 5.5 lowPassed tests

A task counts as solved when its tests passed or a judge found the fix equivalent to the merged change, as in the leaderboard’s Solved column. Stet score also weighs code quality, so it can order the two differently.

All 24 compared tasks
Task by task
TaskGPT 5.6 Luna lowHaiku 5.5 lowSolved by
stet-232b50baPassed testsPassed testsBoth
stet-3169aefaPassed testsPassed testsBoth
stet-5276aa3fPassed testsPassed testsBoth
stet-89dfbc27Passed testsPassed testsBoth
stet-b28f4fe7Passed testsPassed testsBoth
stet-commit-bbbbae09FailedPassed testsHaiku 5.5 low only
stet-66762b4cEquivalent to the merged fixEquivalent to the merged fixBoth
stet-commit-5d766ddeEquivalent to the merged fixEquivalent to the merged fixBoth
stet-commit-f0caded9Equivalent to the merged fixEquivalent to the merged fixBoth
stet-43493c52Passed testsPassed testsBoth
stet-commit-f8ae1177FailedFailedNeither
stet-15439c21Equivalent to the merged fixEquivalent to the merged fixBoth
stet-2450ca2dFailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-342d0ac0FailedFailedNeither
stet-6f84e978FailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-60a0e6c2FailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-5e075641FailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-2826765eFailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-a8716b88FailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-e928166fFailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-30506f8eFailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-87814583FailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-d2ab0c25FailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-e41c2e2dFailedFailedNeither

Side by side

Side by side
MetricGPT 5.6 Luna lowHaiku 5.5 low
Harnesscodex—
Reasoning effortlowlow
Rank15 of 1714 of 17
Stet score45.095% range 39.1–50.445.195% range 40.2–49.3
Solved10/246 passed, 4 judged equivalent11/247 passed, 4 judged equivalent
Cost / task$0.05$0.06
Agent time / task6.7 min9.9 min

See which setup wins on your repo

Stet replays your merged PRs, scores quality above pass/fail, and delivers comparison reports through your agent.

Run it on your repo

About this data

  • 24 tasks, each a merged change replayed from the repo as it was just before the merge.
  • Data from .
  • Both setups come from the same leaderboard run of 17 setups: bmk_d4ba310fdf50db4ccb2092e3.

See all 17 setups on the leaderboardHow Stet measures