STET

flux-pr-1791

sqlparser-rs (Rust) · W2 · GPT-5.3 Codex

pass_with_warn

Tests passed. 1/1 commands passed. Strength: strong.

100.0% run pass rate
Tier 1
primary testspassednon equivalentfail
env PATH=/root/.cargo/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin cargo test --all-features
gold passagent pass

Partial score: 1/1

Publishable: yesCache: miss

Trajectory

codex · partial order only

provider-native trajectory captured; validation and decision steps are appended with coarse ordering only

session start
Session started
#1
assistant turn
Assistant turn
#2
tool call
Command started
#3

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#4

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#5

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#6

shell command exit code 0

assistant turn
Assistant turn
#7
tool call
Command started
#8

shell command

tool call
Command started
#9

shell command

tool call
Command started
#10

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#11

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#12

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#13

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#14

shell command

tool call
Command started
#15

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#16

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#17

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#18

shell command

tool call
Command started
#19

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#20

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#21

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#22

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#23

shell command exit code 0

assistant turn
Assistant turn
#24
tool call
Command started
#25

shell command

tool call
Command started
#26

shell command

tool call
Command started
#27

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#28

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#29

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#30

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#31

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#32

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#33

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#34

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#35

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#36

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#37

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#38

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#39

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#40

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#41

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#42

shell command exit code 1

tool call
Command started
#43

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#44

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#45

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#46

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#47

shell command

tool call
Command started
#48

shell command

patch written
Patch captured
#49

Flux captured agent.patch for this trial

validation
Tests passed
#50

env

equivalence
Equivalence judgment
#51

non_equivalent

code review
Code review judgment
#52

fail

decision
Final decision
#53

pass_with_warn

Quality

equivalence
non_equivalent
93% confidence
code review
fail
4 findings
footprint
low (0.25)
behavioral
100.0%
cost
$5.82 · 2.6M

Equivalence Reasoning

behavioral

The patch only partially implements the intent. It adds optional tokens, but does not introduce a proper conditional-block representation for MSSQL `BEGIN...END` bodies (it encodes them as `Statement::StartTransaction`, which is semantically incorrect), keeps `else_block`/`if_block` shapes tied to old structures, and likely misparses `IF ... SELECT ... ELSE ...` because MSSQL alias-reservation handling for `ELSE`/`IF` was not added. It also does not reliably track actual CASE end tokens (captures presence, not robust token identity).

Code Review

correctness: 1/4edge case handling: 1/4introduced bug risk: 1/4maintainability idioms: 1/4

The agent patch likely does not satisfy the intended change: it introduces MSSQL IF support but models BEGIN...END incorrectly, applies a brittle ELSE strategy, and only partially refactors conditional AST structures, creating high risk of behavioral mismatch and regressions.

4 findings
MSSQL BEGIN...END branch body is encoded as transaction statement
major

The MSSQL IF parser maps BEGIN...END blocks to `Statement::StartTransaction`, which is semantically different from a conditional statement block and can break AST consumers and SQL re-serialization expectations.

src/parser/mod.rs:785
ELSE association logic is brittle for single-statement IF bodies
major

ELSE handling is guarded by a special `semicolon_before_else` check and otherwise depends on prior statement parsing behavior, which is fragile for `IF cond SELECT ... ELSE SELECT ...` forms and can misparse when delimiters vary.

src/parser/mod.rs:723
Conditional AST refactor is only partial and inconsistent
major

The patch adds optional tokens to existing structures but keeps old `ConditionalStatementKind`/flat statement vectors, diverging from a unified block model and increasing complexity/inconsistency across IF and CASE handling.

src/ast/mod.rs:2181
MSSQL keyword/alias ambiguity safeguards are missing
major

The dialect patch hooks custom IF parsing but does not add alias-reservation handling for IF/ELSE, leaving parser ambiguity edge cases unaddressed in T-SQL contexts.

src/dialect/mssql.rs:21