Skip to the comparison
STET
Run it on your repo

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash max vs GPT 5.6 Luna low

GPT 5.6 Luna low leads on speed and cost; quality is too close to call.

Quality
+5.6 pts
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash max
3–1 head to head, 20 tied
Speed
7.4× faster
GPT 5.6 Luna low
6.7 min vs 49.3 min per task
Cost
9.7× cheaper
GPT 5.6 Luna low
$0.05 vs $0.49 per task

24 tasksData from

Stet score

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash maxmax reasoningRank 8 of 17

50.695% range 47.1–54.75.6 points higher

GPT 5.6 Luna lowcodex · low reasoningRank 15 of 17

45.095% range 39.1–50.4

A directional read: their 95% score ranges overlap.

Quality

Head-to-head matchups

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash max won3

Tied20

GPT 5.6 Luna low won1

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash max’s win share 56%, 95% range 49–64%Ties are within judge noise.

Task by task

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash max solved 3 tasks that GPT 5.6 Luna low didn’t, and GPT 5.6 Luna low solved 1 that DeepSeek V4.1 Flash max didn’t. Both solved 9; neither solved 11.

stet-commit-bbbbae09Solved by 15 of 17 setups

  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash maxPassed tests
  • GPT 5.6 Luna lowFailed

A task counts as solved when its tests passed or a judge found the fix equivalent to the merged change, as in the leaderboard’s Solved column. Stet score also weighs code quality, so it can order the two differently.

All 24 compared tasks
Task by task
TaskDeepSeek V4.1 Flash maxGPT 5.6 Luna lowSolved by
stet-232b50baPassed testsPassed testsBoth
stet-3169aefaPassed testsPassed testsBoth
stet-5276aa3fPassed testsPassed testsBoth
stet-89dfbc27Passed testsPassed testsBoth
stet-b28f4fe7Passed testsPassed testsBoth
stet-commit-bbbbae09Passed testsFailedDeepSeek V4.1 Flash max only
stet-66762b4cPassed testsEquivalent to the merged fixBoth
stet-commit-5d766ddeEquivalent to the merged fixEquivalent to the merged fixBoth
stet-commit-f0caded9FailedEquivalent to the merged fixGPT 5.6 Luna low only
stet-43493c52Passed testsPassed testsBoth
stet-commit-f8ae1177Passed testsFailedDeepSeek V4.1 Flash max only
stet-15439c21Equivalent to the merged fixEquivalent to the merged fixBoth
stet-2450ca2dFailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-342d0ac0Equivalent to the merged fixFailedDeepSeek V4.1 Flash max only
stet-6f84e978FailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-60a0e6c2FailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-5e075641FailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-2826765eFailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-a8716b88FailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-e928166fFailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-30506f8eFailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-87814583FailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-d2ab0c25FailedFailedNeither
stet-commit-e41c2e2dFailedFailedNeither

Side by side

Side by side
MetricDeepSeek V4.1 Flash maxGPT 5.6 Luna low
Harness—codex
Reasoning effortmaxlow
Rank8 of 1715 of 17
Stet score50.695% range 47.1–54.745.095% range 39.1–50.4
Solved12/249 passed, 3 judged equivalent10/246 passed, 4 judged equivalent
Cost / task$0.49from 23/24 tasks$0.05
Agent time / task49.3 min6.7 min

See which setup wins on your repo

Stet replays your merged PRs, scores quality above pass/fail, and delivers comparison reports through your agent.

Run it on your repo

About this data

  • 24 tasks, each a merged change replayed from the repo as it was just before the merge.
  • Data from .
  • Both setups come from the same leaderboard run of 17 setups: bmk_d4ba310fdf50db4ccb2092e3.

See all 17 setups on the leaderboardHow Stet measures