STET

flux-pr-1268

graphql-go-tools (Go) · W1 · GPT-5.1 Codex Mini

fail_guardrail

Tests: unknown. 0/1 commands passed. Strength: missing.

57.1% run pass rate
Tier 1
guardrail preflight failedprimary equivalenceunknownequivalentneeds generated testsweak signal riskall commands ignoredunknown no gold pass commands
go test -C v2 ./... -count=1 -timeout=300s
gold unknownagent

Partial score: 0/0

Publishable: yesWeak signal risk: yes

Trajectory

codex · partial order only

provider-native trajectory captured; validation and decision steps are appended with coarse ordering only

session start
Session started
#1
tool call
Command started
#2

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#3

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#4

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#5

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#6

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#7

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#8

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#9

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#10

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#11

shell command exit code 2

tool call
Command started
#12

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#13

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#14

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#15

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#16

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#17

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#18

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#19

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#20

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#21

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#22

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#23

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#24

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#25

shell command exit code 1

tool call
Command started
#26

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#27

shell command exit code 1

tool call
Command started
#28

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#29

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#30

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#31

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#32

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#33

shell command exit code 1

tool call
Command started
#34

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#35

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#36

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#37

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#38

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#39

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#40

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#41

shell command exit code 1

tool call
Command started
#42

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#43

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#44

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#45

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#46

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#47

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#48

shell command

patch written
Patch captured
#49

Flux captured agent.patch for this trial

validation
Validation recorded
#50
equivalence
Equivalence judgment
#51

equivalent

code review
Code review judgment
#52

unsure

decision
Final decision
#53

fail_guardrail

Quality

equivalence
equivalent
86% confidence
code review
unsure · 65/100
2 findings
footprint
low (0.30)
behavioral
cost
$4.30 · 16.1M

Equivalence Reasoning

stylistic

Code Review

correctness: 3/4edge case handling: 2/4introduced bug risk: 3/4maintainability idioms: 2/4

The patch likely works and captures most requested behavior changes, but it appears only partially aligned with the intended API-level migration and leaves some dependency edge-case handling implicit.

2 findings
Planning behavior API migration remains partial
major

The intended shift is to datasource-configuration/factory-level planning behavior, but core interfaces still expose and consume `DataSourcePlanningBehavior()` rather than a unified `PlanningBehavior()` accessor, leaving the old abstraction shape in place.

v2/pkg/engine/plan/datasource_configuration.go:257
Rewriter constructor does not enforce required dependencies
minor

Although dependencies are passed in constructor, nil `dsConfiguration`/`upstreamDefinition` are still accepted and defaulted, so missing upstream-schema cases are not explicitly surfaced.

v2/pkg/engine/plan/abstract_selection_rewriter.go:77