STET■

flux-pr-1169

graphql-go-tools (Go) · W1 · GPT-5.1 Codex Mini

graphql-go-tools (Go)sqlparser-rs (Rust)Zod (TypeScript)
W2W1
|
GPT-5.1 Codex Mini
fail_guardrail

Tests: unknown. 0/1 commands passed. Strength: missing.

57.1% run pass rate
Tier 1
guardrail preflight failedprimary equivalenceunknownnon equivalentneeds generated testsweak signal riskall commands ignoredunknown no gold pass commands
go test -C v2 ./... -count=1 -timeout=300s
gold unknownagent —

Partial score: 0/0

Publishable: yesWeak signal risk: yes

Trajectory

codex · partial order only

provider-native trajectory captured; validation and decision steps are appended with coarse ordering only

session start
Session started
#1
results
tool call
Command started
#2

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#3

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#4

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#5

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#6

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#7

shell command exit code 1

results
tool call
Command started
#8

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#9

shell command exit code 1

results
tool call
Command started
#10

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#11

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#12

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#13

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#14

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#15

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#16

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#17

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#18

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#19

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#20

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#21

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#22

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#23

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#24

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#25

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#26

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#27

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#28

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#29

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#30

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#31

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#32

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#33

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#34

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#35

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#36

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#37

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#38

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#39

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#40

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#41

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#42

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#43

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#44

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#45

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#46

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#47

shell command exit code 1

results
tool call
Command started
#48

shell command

results
patch written
Patch captured
#49

Flux captured agent.patch for this trial

agent.patch
validation
Validation recorded
#50
validation
equivalence
Equivalence judgment
#51

non_equivalent

validation
code review
Code review judgment
#52

fail

task detail
decision
Final decision
#53

fail_guardrail

task detail

Quality

equivalence
non_equivalent
82% confidence
code review
fail · 30/100
3 findings
footprint
low (0.17)
behavioral
—
cost
$2.67 · 9.2M

Equivalence Reasoning

behavioral

Code Review

correctness: 1/4edge case handling: 1/4introduced bug risk: 1/4maintainability idioms: 2/4

The agent patch partially updates message text and locations, but it likely does not satisfy the intended PR: key spec-compliant field-selection behaviors and the new centralized Apollo validation-failed mechanism are not correctly implemented.

3 findings
Enum leaf fields with sub-selections are still accepted
major

Validation only rejects sub-selections for scalar fields (`NodeKindScalarTypeDefinition`) and does not reject enum fields with selections, which should also be treated as leaf types.

v2/pkg/astvalidation/operation_rule_validate_field_selections.go:58
Missing-subfield error uses wrong type context
major

The call passes `typeName` (enclosing type) into `ErrMissingFieldSelectionOnNonScalar`, but the spec-style message expects the field's return type (e.g., `User`, `User!`, `[User]`). This can produce incorrect error text.

v2/pkg/astvalidation/operation_rule_validate_field_selections.go:61
Centralized validation-failed mechanism not implemented as intended
major

Status/extension codes are applied in `Validate` only when `ReplaceUndefinedOpFieldError` is set, rather than via a centralized walker-level external-error hook with the new dedicated compatibility flag. This keeps old flag semantics and misses the intended architecture change.

v2/pkg/astvalidation/operation_validation.go:90
Evidencetask_detail (—)trajectory (15.0 KB)validation (115.5 KB)results (58.5 KB)run_metadata (1.6 KB)agent_patch (12.3 KB)summary (94.5 KB)manifest (495 B)