STET

flux-pr-1338

graphql-go-tools (Go) · W2 · GPT-5.3 Codex

pass_with_warn

Tests passed. 1/1 commands passed. Strength: strong.

93.1% run pass rate
Tier 1
primary testspassedequivalentfail
go test -C v2 ./... -count=1 -timeout=300s
gold passagent pass

Partial score: 1/1

Publishable: yesCache: miss

Trajectory

codex · partial order only

provider-native trajectory captured; validation and decision steps are appended with coarse ordering only

session start
Session started
#1
assistant turn
Assistant turn
#2
tool call
Command started
#3

shell command

tool call
Command started
#4

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#5

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#6

shell command exit code 0

assistant turn
Assistant turn
#7
tool call
Command started
#8

shell command

tool call
Command started
#9

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#10

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#11

shell command exit code 0

assistant turn
Assistant turn
#12
tool call
Command started
#13

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#14

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#15

shell command

tool call
Command started
#16

shell command

tool call
Command started
#17

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#18

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#19

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#20

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#21

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#22

shell command exit code 0

assistant turn
Assistant turn
#23
tool call
Command started
#24

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#25

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#26

shell command

tool call
Command started
#27

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#28

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#29

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#30

shell command

tool call
Command started
#31

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#32

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#33

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#34

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#35

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#36

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#37

shell command exit code 0

assistant turn
Assistant turn
#38
tool call
Command started
#39

shell command

tool call
Command started
#40

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#41

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#42

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#43

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#44

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#45

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#46

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#47

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#48

shell command exit code 0

patch written
Patch captured
#49

Flux captured agent.patch for this trial

validation
Tests passed
#50

go

equivalence
Equivalence judgment
#51

equivalent

code review
Code review judgment
#52

fail

decision
Final decision
#53

pass_with_warn

Quality

equivalence
equivalent
79% confidence
code review
fail
2 findings
footprint
low (0.11)
behavioral
100.0%
cost
$4.61 · 1.8M

Equivalence Reasoning

behavioral

The agent patch appears to cover the task’s core behavioral intent: it prevents removed/orphaned subtree suggestions from remaining selected, processes pending `@requires`/key requirements at `EnterSelectionSet` (before descending), preserves correct type context for nested requirements, remaps dependencies after rewrites, and fixes path walking so failure on one datasource no longer prematurely skips planning on alternatives (only skipping children if no datasource can plan the field). These directly address the three described planner bugs, even though implementation details differ from the gold patch.

Code Review

correctness: 2/4edge case handling: 2/4introduced bug risk: 1/4maintainability idioms: 2/4

The patch likely fixes part of the intended behavior, but it does not fully de-risk the multi-datasource path-planning conflict and introduces a high-risk dependency-remap overwrite path; it is probably not a complete match for the intended PR change.

2 findings
Missing-path handling still fires before alternative datasource planning is resolved
major

Inside `EnterField`, `handleMissingPath(...)` is called immediately when one datasource cannot plan the field, even though another datasource in the same suggestions list may successfully plan it later. This can leave false unresolved-path state and misguide downstream planning decisions.

v2/pkg/engine/plan/path_builder_visitor.go:471
Dependency-kind remap can be nondeterministically overwritten on key collisions
major

When remapping `fieldDependencyKind`, multiple original dependency pairs can collapse to the same remapped key; assignment into a map overwrites prior values with no merge rule, so final dependency kind depends on iteration/write order.

v2/pkg/engine/plan/node_selection_visitor.go:772