STET

flux-pr-1380

graphql-go-tools (Go) · W2 · GPT-5.3 Codex

pass_with_warn

Tests passed. 1/1 commands passed. Strength: strong.

93.1% run pass rate
Tier 1
primary testspassednon equivalentfail
go test -C v2 ./... -count=1 -timeout=300s
gold passagent pass

Partial score: 1/1

Publishable: yesCache: miss

Trajectory

codex · partial order only

provider-native trajectory captured; validation and decision steps are appended with coarse ordering only

session start
Session started
#1
assistant turn
Assistant turn
#2
tool call
Command started
#3

shell command

tool call
Command started
#4

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#5

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#6

shell command exit code 0

assistant turn
Assistant turn
#7
tool call
Command started
#8

shell command

tool call
Command started
#9

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#10

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#11

shell command exit code 0

assistant turn
Assistant turn
#12
tool call
Command started
#13

shell command

tool call
Command started
#14

shell command

tool call
Command started
#15

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#16

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#17

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#18

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#19

shell command

tool call
Command started
#20

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#21

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#22

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#23

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#24

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#25

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#26

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#27

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#28

shell command exit code 0

assistant turn
Assistant turn
#29
tool call
Command started
#30

shell command

tool call
Command started
#31

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#32

shell command exit code 0

tool result
Command finished
#33

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#34

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#35

shell command exit code 0

assistant turn
Assistant turn
#36
tool call
Command started
#37

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#38

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#39

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#40

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#41

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#42

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#43

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#44

shell command exit code 0

assistant turn
Assistant turn
#45
tool call
Command started
#46

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#47

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#48

shell command

patch written
Patch captured
#49

Flux captured agent.patch for this trial

validation
Tests passed
#50

go

equivalence
Equivalence judgment
#51

non_equivalent

code review
Code review judgment
#52

fail

decision
Final decision
#53

pass_with_warn

Quality

equivalence
non_equivalent
95% confidence
code review
fail
2 findings
footprint
low (0.09)
behavioral
100.0%
cost
$7.68 · 3.6M

Equivalence Reasoning

behavioral

The agent patch only changes `addFieldDependencies` to skip attaching `@requires` when dependencies are on the same planner. It does not implement the core intent: detecting when `@requires` fields are already satisfied by upstream `@provides` (path/type-aware), tracking provided fields, and skipping redundant required-field planning/fetches accordingly.

Code Review

correctness: 1/4edge case handling: 1/4introduced bug risk: 2/4maintainability idioms: 2/4

The patch likely does not satisfy the intended change: it adjusts planner dependency handling but does not implement detection that `@requires` fields are already satisfied by ancestor `@provides`, so redundant fetch planning is likely unresolved.

2 findings
Core `@provides`-satisfies-`@requires` behavior is not implemented
major

The task requires skipping redundant fetches when required fields are already provided higher in the path. This patch only alters dependency attachment in `addFieldDependencies` and does not add logic to track provided fields or evaluate required-field coverage, so the intended planner optimization is likely still missing.

v2/pkg/engine/plan/path_builder_visitor.go:689
Added tests verify a different behavior than the PR intent
major

The new tests assert whether required fields are attached only for cross-planner dependencies, but they do not cover the federation scenario of `@requires` fields already satisfied by ancestor `@provides`, reducing confidence that the intended regression is fixed.

v2/pkg/engine/plan/path_builder_visitor_test.go:25