STET

flux-pr-1099

graphql-go-tools (Go) · W2 · GPT-5.1 Codex Mini

pass_with_warn

Tests passed. 1/1 commands passed. Strength: strong.

96.6% run pass rate
Tier 1
primary testspassednon equivalentfail
go test -C v2 ./... -count=1 -timeout=300s
gold passagent pass

Partial score: 1/1

Publishable: yesCache: miss

Trajectory

codex · partial order only

provider-native trajectory captured; validation and decision steps are appended with coarse ordering only

session start
Session started
#1
tool call
Command started
#2

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#3

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#4

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#5

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#6

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#7

shell command exit code 2

tool call
Command started
#8

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#9

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#10

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#11

shell command exit code 1

tool call
Command started
#12

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#13

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#14

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#15

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#16

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#17

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#18

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#19

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#20

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#21

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#22

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#23

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#24

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#25

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#26

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#27

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#28

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#29

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#30

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#31

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#32

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#33

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#34

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#35

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#36

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#37

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#38

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#39

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#40

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#41

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#42

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#43

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#44

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#45

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#46

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#47

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#48

shell command

patch written
Patch captured
#49

Flux captured agent.patch for this trial

validation
Tests passed
#50

go

equivalence
Equivalence judgment
#51

non_equivalent

code review
Code review judgment
#52

fail

decision
Final decision
#53

pass_with_warn

Quality

equivalence
non_equivalent
76% confidence
code review
fail
3 findings
footprint
medium (0.60)
behavioral
100.0%
cost
$2.60 · 9.0M

Equivalence Reasoning

behavioral

The patch removes `ValidArguments` and routes argument checks through `Values`, but the shown changes do not demonstrate the key behavioral fix: unifying variable type compatibility checks inside `Values` (especially across non-null/list/named nested positions) with one consistent path. It appears to mostly delete/refactor rule wiring and adjust `EnterArgument`, which is likely insufficient for the nested list-of-input-object variable validation bug described.

Code Review

correctness: 1/4edge case handling: 1/4introduced bug risk: 1/4maintainability idioms: 2/4

The agent patch appears incomplete relative to the intended fix: it removes the old rule and rewires entry points but does not clearly implement the required unified nested variable-type validation path, making it unlikely to satisfy the task reliably.

3 findings
Core compatibility logic removed without equivalent unified implementation
major

The patch deletes the full `ValidArguments` visitor implementation and replaces it with `return Values()`, but the shown `Values` edits are limited to `EnterArgument` call flow and do not include the consolidated variable type compatibility path required for nested list/input-object fields.

v2/pkg/astvalidation/operation_rule_valid_arguments.go:1
Potential signature/behavior mismatch introduced at value validation callsite
major

The call to `valueSatisfiesInputValueDefinitionType` was changed to pass a third `definition` argument at the callsite; without consistent method signature and downstream logic refactors, this is a likely source of build/test failure or incorrect validation behavior.

v2/pkg/astvalidation/operation_rule_values.go:67
Variable lookup path remains operation-ancestor dependent
major

The new `EnterArgument` logic still resolves variable definitions via `VariableDefinitionByNameAndOperation(v.Ancestors[0].Ref, ...)` only. The intended fix uses a more robust lookup path to handle nested contexts consistently, so nested/fragment scenarios can still be misvalidated.

v2/pkg/astvalidation/operation_rule_values.go:54