STET■

flux-pr-1268

graphql-go-tools (Go) · W2 · GPT-5.1 Codex Mini

graphql-go-tools (Go)sqlparser-rs (Rust)Zod (TypeScript)
W2W1
|
GPT-5.1 Codex MiniGPT-5.3 CodexGPT-5.4
pass_with_warn

Tests passed. 1/1 commands passed. Strength: strong.

96.6% run pass rate
Tier 1
primary testspassedequivalentfail
go test -C v2 ./... -count=1 -timeout=300s
gold passagent pass

Partial score: 1/1

Publishable: yesCache: miss

Trajectory

codex · partial order only

provider-native trajectory captured; validation and decision steps are appended with coarse ordering only

session start
Session started
#1
results
tool call
Command started
#2

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#3

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#4

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#5

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#6

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#7

shell command exit code 1

results
tool call
Command started
#8

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#9

shell command exit code 1

results
tool call
Command started
#10

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#11

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#12

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#13

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#14

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#15

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#16

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#17

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#18

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#19

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#20

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#21

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#22

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#23

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#24

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#25

shell command exit code 1

results
tool call
Command started
#26

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#27

shell command exit code 1

results
tool call
Command started
#28

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#29

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#30

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#31

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#32

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#33

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#34

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#35

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#36

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#37

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#38

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#39

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#40

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#41

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#42

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#43

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#44

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#45

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#46

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#47

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#48

shell command

results
patch written
Patch captured
#49

Flux captured agent.patch for this trial

agent.patch
validation
Tests passed
#50

go

validation
equivalence
Equivalence judgment
#51

equivalent

validation
code review
Code review judgment
#52

fail

task detail
decision
Final decision
#53

pass_with_warn

task detail

Quality

equivalence
equivalent
71% confidence
code review
fail
3 findings
footprint
medium (0.38)
behavioral
100.0%
cost
$4.54 · 16.5M

Equivalence Reasoning

stylistic

The agent patch appears to implement the core intent: planning behavior is removed from per-planner implementations, surfaced via datasource/factory-level configuration, call sites are updated to read behavior from datasource configuration, and abstract selection rewriter setup is moved to constructor-time dependency injection. Naming differs from the gold patch (`DataSourcePlanningBehavior`/`PlanTypeNameFields` vs `PlanningBehavior`/`AllowPlanningTypeName`), but this looks like an equivalent design choice rather than a behavioral miss.

Code Review

correctness: 2/4edge case handling: 1/4introduced bug risk: 1/4maintainability idioms: 2/4

The patch partially follows the direction (factory-level behavior and rewriter constructor simplification) but likely does not fully satisfy the intended change due to API/field-name divergence and missing visible support for the new unconditional fragment-flattening behavior.

3 findings
Factory planning behavior API name diverges from intended contract
major

The patch adds/uses `DataSourcePlanningBehavior()` on datasource configuration/factories instead of the intended factory-level `PlanningBehavior()` API, indicating an interface mismatch that can break integration expectations and downstream call sites.

v2/pkg/engine/plan/datasource_configuration.go:25
Typename planning rename appears inconsistent
major

The new behavior uses `PlanTypeNameFields` in datasource factory output; this does not match the intended renamed flag (`AllowPlanningTypeName`) and risks consumers reading/writing a different field than expected.

v2/pkg/engine/datasource/introspection_datasource/factory.go:36
No visible support for unconditional inline-fragment flattening option
major

The intended gRPC-related planning option for unconditional inline-fragment flattening is not present in the shown behavior objects or call sites, so abstract-fragment edge cases likely remain unresolved.

v2/pkg/engine/datasource/introspection_datasource/factory.go:33
Evidencetask_detail (—)trajectory (15.0 KB)validation (155.9 KB)results (56.1 KB)run_metadata (1.6 KB)agent_patch (26.6 KB)summary (263.6 KB)manifest (677 B)