STET

flux-pr-1155

graphql-go-tools (Go) · W2 · GPT-5.1 Codex Mini

pass

Tests passed. 1/1 commands passed. Strength: strong.

96.6% run pass rate
Tier 1
primary testspassedequivalentunsure
go test -C v2 ./... -count=1 -timeout=300s
gold passagent pass

Partial score: 1/1

Publishable: yesCache: miss

Trajectory

codex · partial order only

provider-native trajectory captured; validation and decision steps are appended with coarse ordering only

session start
Session started
#1
tool call
Command started
#2

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#3

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#4

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#5

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#6

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#7

shell command exit code 1

tool call
Command started
#8

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#9

shell command exit code 1

tool call
Command started
#10

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#11

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#12

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#13

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#14

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#15

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#16

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#17

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#18

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#19

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#20

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#21

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#22

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#23

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#24

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#25

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#26

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#27

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#28

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#29

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#30

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#31

shell command exit code 1

tool call
Command started
#32

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#33

shell command exit code 1

tool call
Command started
#34

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#35

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#36

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#37

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#38

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#39

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#40

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#41

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#42

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#43

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#44

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#45

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#46

shell command

tool result
Command finished
#47

shell command exit code 0

tool call
Command started
#48

shell command

patch written
Patch captured
#49

Flux captured agent.patch for this trial

validation
Tests passed
#50

go

equivalence
Equivalence judgment
#51

equivalent

code review
Code review judgment
#52

unsure

decision
Final decision
#53

pass

Quality

equivalence
equivalent
83% confidence
code review
unsure
2 findings
footprint
low (0.17)
behavioral
100.0%
cost
$2.38 · 8.2M

Equivalence Reasoning

stylistic

The agent patch covers the core intended behaviors: repeated scalar handling in gRPC request compilation and response marshaling, null/invalid message/list safety in marshaling, inclusion of gRPC status metadata in error output, and support for both disabling gRPC datasource usage and supplying a dynamic gRPC client via factory callback. It differs from the gold patch in API shape and touched files, but the functional intent is implemented.

Code Review

correctness: 3/4edge case handling: 3/4introduced bug risk: 2/4maintainability idioms: 3/4

The patch likely addresses most of the intended PR scope, especially repeated scalar handling and gRPC error/status enrichment, but it introduces a notable correctness gap in repeated-enum handling and some moderate risk in repeated-message fallback behavior.

2 findings
Repeated enum values can be silently dropped
major

In repeated enum handling, unmatched input values are skipped without an error/report, which can produce request lists with missing elements and hard-to-debug behavior.

v2/pkg/engine/datasource/grpc_datasource/compiler.go:423
Repeated message fields may fall through to scalar conversion
major

The repeated-field logic processes message elements only when both message refs and nested metadata are present; otherwise it falls through to scalar conversion, which can hide mapping/schema issues and emit invalid values instead of failing.

v2/pkg/engine/datasource/grpc_datasource/compiler.go:410