flux-pr-1260

graphql-go-tools (Go) · W2 · GPT-5.4

graphql-go-tools (Go)sqlparser-rs (Rust)Zod (TypeScript)

W2 W1

GPT-5.1 Codex Mini GPT-5.3 Codex GPT-5.4

pass_with_warn

Tests passed. 1/1 commands passed. Strength: strong.

89.7% run pass rate

Tier 1

primary testspassedequivalent

go test -C v2 ./... -count=1 -timeout=300s

gold passagent pass

Partial score: 1/1

Publishable: yesCache: miss

Trajectory

codex · partial order only

provider-native trajectory captured; validation and decision steps are appended with coarse ordering only

session start

Session started

results

assistant turn

Assistant turn

task detail

tool call

Command started

shell command

results

tool result

Command finished

shell command exit code 0

results

tool call

Command started

shell command

results

tool call

Command started

shell command

results

tool result

Command finished

shell command exit code 128

results

tool result

Command finished

shell command exit code 0

results

assistant turn

Assistant turn

task detail

tool call

Command started

#10

shell command

results

tool call

Command started

#11

shell command

results

tool result

Command finished

#12

shell command exit code 0

results

tool result

Command finished

#13

shell command exit code 0

results

tool call

Command started

#14

shell command

results

tool result

Command finished

#15

shell command exit code 0

results

assistant turn

Assistant turn

#16

task detail

tool call

Command started

#17

shell command

results

tool result

Command finished

#18

shell command exit code 0

results

tool call

Command started

#19

shell command

results

tool call

Command started

#20

shell command

results

tool result

Command finished

#21

shell command exit code 0

results

tool result

Command finished

#22

shell command exit code 0

results

assistant turn

Assistant turn

#23

task detail

tool call

Command started

#24

shell command

results

tool result

Command finished

#25

shell command exit code 0

results

tool call

Command started

#26

shell command

results

tool call

Command started

#27

shell command

results

tool result

Command finished

#28

shell command exit code 0

results

tool result

Command finished

#29

shell command exit code 0

results

tool call

Command started

#30

shell command

results

tool result

Command finished

#31

shell command exit code 0

results

tool call

Command started

#32

shell command

results

tool result

Command finished

#33

shell command exit code 0

results

tool call

Command started

#34

shell command

results

tool result

Command finished

#35

shell command exit code 0

results

tool call

Command started

#36

shell command

results

tool result

Command finished

#37

shell command exit code 0

results

tool call

Command started

#38

shell command

results

tool result

Command finished

#39

shell command exit code 0

results

tool call

Command started

#40

shell command

results

tool result

Command finished

#41

shell command exit code 0

results

tool call

Command started

#42

shell command

results

tool call

Command started

#43

shell command

results

tool result

Command finished

#44

shell command exit code 0

results

tool result

Command finished

#45

shell command exit code 0

results

tool call

Command started

#46

shell command

results

tool result

Command finished

#47

shell command exit code 0

results

tool call

Command started

#48

shell command

results

patch written

Patch captured

#49

Flux captured agent.patch for this trial

agent.patch

validation

Tests passed

#50

validation

equivalence

Equivalence judgment

#51

equivalent

validation

code review

Code review judgment

#52

fail

task detail

decision

Final decision

#53

pass_with_warn

task detail

Quality

equivalence

equivalent

74% confidence

code review

fail · 39/100

3 findings

footprint

low (0.31)

behavioral

100.0%

cost

$1.53 · 2.7M

Equivalence Reasoning

stylistic

Code Review

correctness: 2/4edge case handling: 2/4introduced bug risk: 1/4maintainability idioms: 1/4

The patch appears to partially address subscription query-plan introspection but diverges from the intended cleaner approach by retaining input parsing and adding duplicated metadata fields, so it is likely not a full or robust match for the target change.

3 findings

Trigger query plan is rebuilt from parsed input instead of using canonical plan object

major

appendTriggerToFetchTree still parses `Trigger.Input` via jsonparser and then creates a new `QueryPlan{Query: v}`. This can return stale/empty query text in introspection paths and drops any non-Query fields present on `Trigger.QueryPlan`.

v2/pkg/engine/postprocess/postprocess.go:205

Duplicated trigger metadata fields introduce inconsistency risk

major

Adding `SourceID`, `SourceName`, and `FetchID` to trigger state duplicates data already derivable from field info; postprocess now mixes both sources with fallback precedence, which can diverge across planners and responses.

v2/pkg/engine/resolve/response.go:22

Tests validate old subscription plan shape rather than enhanced formatting path

minor

The updated subscription resolver test asserts a `kind:"Sequence"` trigger-only query-plan payload, which does not exercise richer subscription query-plan rendering behavior and can mask incomplete implementation of subscription introspection output changes.

v2/pkg/engine/resolve/resolve_test.go:5317

Evidencetask_detail (—)trajectory (14.9 KB)validation (84.3 KB)results (60.3 KB)run_metadata (1.6 KB)agent_patch (7.2 KB)summary (263.6 KB)manifest (677 B)