STET■

flux-pr-1268

graphql-go-tools (Go) · W2 · GPT-5.4

graphql-go-tools (Go)sqlparser-rs (Rust)Zod (TypeScript)
W2W1
|
GPT-5.1 Codex MiniGPT-5.3 CodexGPT-5.4
pass

Tests passed. 1/1 commands passed. Strength: strong.

89.7% run pass rate
Tier 1
primary testspassedequivalent
go test -C v2 ./... -count=1 -timeout=300s
gold passagent pass

Partial score: 1/1

Publishable: yesCache: miss

Trajectory

codex · partial order only

provider-native trajectory captured; validation and decision steps are appended with coarse ordering only

session start
Session started
#1
results
assistant turn
Assistant turn
#2
task detail
tool call
Command started
#3

shell command

results
tool call
Command started
#4

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#5

shell command exit code 0

results
tool result
Command finished
#6

shell command exit code 0

results
assistant turn
Assistant turn
#7
task detail
tool call
Command started
#8

shell command

results
tool call
Command started
#9

shell command

results
tool call
Command started
#10

shell command

results
tool call
Command started
#11

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#12

shell command exit code 0

results
tool result
Command finished
#13

shell command exit code 0

results
tool result
Command finished
#14

shell command exit code 0

results
tool result
Command finished
#15

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#16

shell command

results
tool call
Command started
#17

shell command

results
tool call
Command started
#18

shell command

results
tool call
Command started
#19

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#20

shell command exit code 0

results
tool result
Command finished
#21

shell command exit code 0

results
tool result
Command finished
#22

shell command exit code 0

results
tool result
Command finished
#23

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#24

shell command

results
tool call
Command started
#25

shell command

results
tool call
Command started
#26

shell command

results
tool call
Command started
#27

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#28

shell command exit code 0

results
tool result
Command finished
#29

shell command exit code 0

results
tool result
Command finished
#30

shell command exit code 0

results
tool result
Command finished
#31

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#32

shell command

results
tool call
Command started
#33

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#34

shell command exit code 0

results
tool result
Command finished
#35

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#36

shell command

results
tool call
Command started
#37

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#38

shell command exit code 0

results
tool result
Command finished
#39

shell command exit code 0

results
assistant turn
Assistant turn
#40
task detail
tool call
Command started
#41

shell command

results
tool call
Command started
#42

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#43

shell command exit code 0

results
tool result
Command finished
#44

shell command exit code 0

results
tool call
Command started
#45

shell command

results
tool call
Command started
#46

shell command

results
tool result
Command finished
#47

shell command exit code 0

results
tool result
Command finished
#48

shell command exit code 0

results
patch written
Patch captured
#49

Flux captured agent.patch for this trial

agent.patch
validation
Tests passed
#50

go

validation
equivalence
Equivalence judgment
#51

equivalent

validation
code review
Code review judgment
#52

pass

task detail
decision
Final decision
#53

pass

task detail

Quality

equivalence
equivalent
71% confidence
code review
pass · 75/100
1 finding
footprint
medium (0.42)
behavioral
100.0%
cost
$3.55 · 6.0M

Equivalence Reasoning

stylistic

Code Review

correctness: 3/4edge case handling: 3/4introduced bug risk: 3/4maintainability idioms: 3/4

The agent patch likely satisfies the intended architectural change (factory-level planning behavior plus constructor-based abstract rewriter setup) and appears broadly correct, with only minor polish-level discrepancy visible in the provided diff.

1 finding
Renamed inline-fragment error keeps old grammar
minor

The new `ErrInlineFragmentHasNoCondition` still uses the old string text `does not exists`; this creates minor inconsistency with the rename and with other wording cleanups.

v2/pkg/engine/plan/abstract_selection_rewriter.go:16
Evidencetask_detail (—)trajectory (14.9 KB)validation (126.0 KB)results (60.3 KB)run_metadata (1.6 KB)agent_patch (25.3 KB)summary (263.6 KB)manifest (677 B)